Talk:No. 7644 Squadron RAuxAF
Appearance
This non-existent page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CONTROVERSY
https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:WikiDan61 Hi, we believe the CONTROVERSY section of the WIKI is irrelevant and incorrect. Personnel are not mouth-pieces for the UK Government, but provide media output for the Royal Air Force. The BBC did not find any of its employees in breach of any policy's and the article in the Belfast Telegraph, aside from the fact that is was from 2008 was a single cited source. I would like to remove this section without it being re-instated — Preceding unsigned comment added by FltLTCarey (talk • contribs)
- @FltLTCarey: I actually tend to agree with you on this, even though I was the one who originally reverted the removal. The removal of properly cited material should be discussed beforehand. If no other editors come to the defense of this section, I have no issue with it being removed. Please give this discussion a few days before considering it closed (at least 3; no more than 7). WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)