Talk:No. 7644 Squadron RAF

Military history: Aviation / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

CONTROVERSY

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:WikiDan61 Hi, we believe the CONTROVERSY section of the WIKI is irrelevant and incorrect. Personnel are not mouth-pieces for the UK Government, but provide media output for the Royal Air Force. The BBC did not find any of its employees in breach of any policy's and the article in the Belfast Telegraph, aside from the fact that is was from 2008 was a single cited source. I would like to remove this section without it being re-instated — Preceding unsigned comment added by FltLTCarey (talk • contribs)

@FltLTCarey: I actually tend to agree with you on this, even though I was the one who originally reverted the removal. The removal of properly cited material should be discussed beforehand. If no other editors come to the defense of this section, I have no issue with it being removed. Please give this discussion a few days before considering it closed (at least 3; no more than 7). WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]