Talk:No. 4 Electronic Switching System

Telecommunications: Bell System Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Bell System task force.

Meaningless

Virtually all of the technical information in this article is meaningless to anyone who doesn't know this stuff already.

What meanings should it explain, that are not explained in the linked articles? Jim.henderson (talk) 17:10, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speak for yourself

This page is highly relevant to telecom history. My lone gripe is that the list only accounts for 4ESS switches in the AT&T long distance network, and doesn't list the 4E's installed at tandem offices in the RBOCs (for example, NYCKNYWM12T in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, NY). Mark abene (talk) 05:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There were also some installed in Korea.§ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirgorpster (talk • contribs) 09:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also found this article fascinating, even though it's very specialized. I hope someone can expand on the call accounting and intercept capabilities. It's weird to think that in the midst of our national debates about privacy and surveillance,much of the actual hardware underneath the phone system has barely changed in my lifetime. bendodge (talk) 18:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]