Talk:No. 207 Squadron RAF

Military history: Aviation / British / European / World War I / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

CCVII?

I suggest this article be renamed No. 207 Squadron RAF - I have never seen it being referred to by its Roman numerals before - both the official RAF website and the Squadron Association website use "207". Letdorf (talk) 10:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I've now done this. Letdorf (talk) 11:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Squadron Bases table, and images

This table contains a staggering 42 entries, many of which were only short duration. Indeed four entries are left partially blank and appear to cover the refuelling points and overnight stop-overs somewhere en-route between the UK and a deployment in Turkey, or Sudan. I'm not sure that this table, cluttered with trivial entries, is of any real benefit to readers as it stands.

And then there are the two images, originally placed alongside the table, limiting it's width and forcing most entries to occupy two lines, making the table stretch on forever. I have temporarily moved the images beyond the table to limit the damage they are doing to the layout of the article. One image is of a memorial at RAF Spilsby. The second image is of one of the many locations 207 sqdn have visited. It's not a particularly good image, but at least 207 spent more than just a few weeks there. Even so, it is just a random choice and does not improve the article IMO. And the caption should be edited to state 'RAF Langar', not 'Langar airfield'.

Overall, I see a lot of dead wood here that should be removed, or cut back in some way. WendlingCrusader (talk) 14:36, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]