Talk:Nitrogen crisis in the Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Soil

	Earth sciences portal Nitrogen crisis in the Netherlands is within the scope of WikiProject Soil, which collaborates on Soil and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.SoilWikipedia:WikiProject SoilTemplate:WikiProject SoilSoil articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Environment

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Introduction and History sections

This is a complex subject. It is probably best to write a short introduction with the chemical and legal aspects. This should not contain any judgements or reference to party political actions.

A history section could then expand on the influence of politics on the crisis. This might also give due attention to other actors in the nitrogen crisis.Grieg2 (talk) 17:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think a short summary in the lead paragraph per WP:LEAD should do. Political actions are bound to be referenced, considering how the nitrogen/construction crisis only exists in its current form as it was recognized and handled as such by the government (the Council of State foremost). Criticism of its handling of the crisis resulted in a pro-farmer political movement sweeping the provincial and water board elections earlier this year, so I don't think we're escaping inclusion of political parties and their decision-making on the matter (within WP:NPOV, of course). With the recent fall of the cabinet and end of the 12-year Rutte era of cabinets, renewed political influence on the nitrogen crisis also seems likely. --NFSreloaded (talk) 18:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not implying that political actions and responsibilities should be left out. To the contrary, I strongly advocate to have a very extensive and properly referenced overview of the political side of this crisis, that has indeed been caused by Dutch politicians. (And not by the EU, as many Dutch politicans are trying to imply.) I am trying to convey that a non-judgemental section about chemistry, Natura2000, PAS, and the council of state verdict could introduce this complex subject. If the reader has this basic knowledge of the problem, the political side can then be properly explained.Grieg2 (talk) 18:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, as stated in the lead sentence the crisis is both "ecological and legal". For now, the introductory five paragraphs of the Dutch article make up the entirety of this article, so translating the rest of it seems the logical next step. --NFSreloaded (talk) 14:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]