Talk:Nissan NX

Merge

It's quite obvious that these two articles are describing the same vehicle but for minor localization differences. I think a merge would improve the quality of both of them. It's a striking and unusual car, and awful fun to drive, it deserves better. — AKADriver ☎ 19:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.

Agreed. Merge seems to be the way to go --Preveen 12:49, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Totally agreed - these are exactly the same vehicle. 100NX is the British name, "Nissan NX" is more global. "Geek Boy" - 100NX.com forum member

NX Coupe also sold in Turkey. We had one of it.

I am not familiar with Wikipedia document changes, but to fix the deadlink about the safety rating in Australia, here is a link to the 2009 edition of the Used Cars Safety Rating: http://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/2DEDF20E-F2D7-4BA6-A80F-5CB68AC34A20/0/UsedCarSafetyRatings2009.pdf

In this document, the Nissan NX/NX-R appears in the bottom of the first page, with a 2 stars rating (meaning "Poor") —Preceding unsigned comment added by Duplicata (talk • contribs) 07:36, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--- Together with other members from the English 100NX forum we decided that the dented and paint-missing NX was not a good advertisement for the little car, so I added the picture that is used on the Dutch NX page. --LJVerkade (talk) 21:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Nissan NX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nissan NX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080723120501/http://www.arrc-online.com/results_2006/2006ARRC_Grp4RACE.pdf to http://www.arrc-online.com/results_2006/2006ARRC_Grp4RACE.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]