Talk:Nisei (The X-Files)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 04:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will review soon! Ruby 2010/2013 04:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

Lead needs specific broadcast date (I was going to fix it, but didn't want to mess up a template I'm unfamiliar with)
'"PopLit, PopCult and The X-Files" - no need for quotation marks
The themes section might be better suited to come after the production section, but that's just my opinion
Italicize The New York Times
"Frank Spotnitz was assigned writing duties for, "Nisei"," - removed that first comma - also, the seventh episode of that season?
"Most notably, Spotnitz script" -> the Spotnitz script or Spotnitz's script
You say there were several scenes requiring stunt work from Duchovny, but wasn't it only the train jumping scene? Or am I misreading it?
Make sure Fox is linked on its first mention in article body, and unlink it elsewhere
Unlink United Kingdom

Otherwise, article looks good. Screenshot seems justified, and there are no dab or external link issues. I'll place this review on hold for the usual seven days. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 17:12, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I believe I've addressed everything. Thanks for reviewing!--Gen. Quon (talk) 18:55, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passing article for GA. Nice work! Ruby 2010/2013 02:28, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Title?

why the title? it is japanese for "2nd generation".

it is sometimes misused in english in place of nikkei (japanese-american), but even then, how does that EITHER apply to this episode?

they are japanese scientists in the US. they are neither nikkei NOR nisei. did the episode focus on their CHILDREN? 209.172.23.183 (talk) 22:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]