Talk:Ning Cai (writer)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Magic Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagicWikipedia:WikiProject MagicTemplate:WikiProject MagicMagic
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Bernie44 (talk · contribs) has been paid by Ning Cai on their behalf.

Neutrality

Much of this article seems to have been taken verbatim from PR material (possibly by someone acting on behalf of the subject - although maybe just a fan). This article should be re-written in more neutral language to bring it in line with WP:BLP, ideally by someone with no connection to the subject. I'm not contesting notability because I think the subject is probably notable enough in the context of the magic profession. Circusandmagicfan (talk) 12:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)Circusandmagicfan[reply]

From the linked references, there is indication that there is a good mix of suitable print news media in the referencing. I thought it seemed still to be pretty neutral. Rolypoly xx (talk) 01:57, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I accept there are lots of cited sources, but I suspect most of them are merely media reports reproducing text from press releases near-verbatim. Examples of things that are problematic include frequent use of the description "mega escape", which is a clear neologism coined by Ning's PR people. The escape in question is similar in scale to many other stage tricks and shares elements with other escapes, such as the Table of Death. The term "mega escape" is meaningless nonsense. Also the claim that she is "Singapore's Only Professional Female Magician" must be regarded with caution - are you telling me there's not a single other woman in a population of 4.5 million who has worked in magic. I don't doubt that she is a very good female magician with a high profile in Singapore and she's notable enough to have a Wiki biography - it's just that the article seems to be an exercise in hyperbole.Circusandmagicfan (talk) 10:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Circusandmagicfan[reply]

I do admire young talents, particularly a beauty like her. However, a whole bulk of information provided in this Wikipedia page of hers can be easily discredited. Everything is wither misinformed or ill-conceptualized in publicity. She's nowhere near "the first professional female magician" in Singapore when there's already someone else who has reached those grounds long before the name Ning even pops out in the local magic scene. Go do a research on "Magic of Love" and "Magic of Lawrence & Priscilla" on the internet and you will see why Ning's PR team should be utterly embarrassed of itself. Do these publicists even track the magic scene? Sex sells, doesn't it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.9.238 (talk) 02:34, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is the "whole bulk of information" that can be discredited? Wiki requires proper referencing which seems to have been done unless all the references made are incorrect? So are you discrediting all the references as in accurate because many of the references are reputable media outlets? The key contention of "First Professional Female Magician" seems to be "professional". The fore-mentioned "Magic of Lawrence & Priscilla" refers to Senior Pastor Lawrence Khong & his daughter who perform magic as an evangilism tool for their mega church Faith Baptist Community Church and not on a full-time professional basis. Priscilla might have been Singapore's first female magician but not professional, whose occupation and living is derived from being a magician.TulipsInShoes (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Ning Cai promoting the 'Be Greater' campaign by Singapore Kindness Movement.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:07, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Ning Cai Author of Misdirection.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]