Talk:Nimm von uns, Herr, du treuer Gott, BWV 101

Nimm von uns, Herr, du treuer Gott, BWV 101 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 14, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical music: Compositions

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 13, 2024.

A fact from Nimm von uns, Herr, du treuer Gott, BWV 101 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 August 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in the central movement of Bach's cantata Nimm von uns, Herr, du treuer Gott, BWV 101, a "furious ritornello" of three oboes is followed unexpectedly by a line of the chorale?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nimm von uns, Herr, du treuer Gott, BWV 101.

Wikipedia

GA Review

Passed. 750 h+ 08:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nimm von uns, Herr, du treuer Gott, BWV 101/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gerda Arendt (talk · contribs) 11:13, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: 750h+ (talk · contribs) 07:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review. 750 h+ 07:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

prose

lead

The cantata belongs to Bach's chorale cantata cycle, the second cantata cycle during his tenure i'd remove the second "cantana

history and words

in the first performance of the cantata on 13 ==> "in the first cantata performance on 13"
I tried "the cantata's first performance". --GA

I remember that in the FAC of BWV 1, the repetition of "cantata" was criticized ;) - I tried by using the title once (but it is too long to do that often, and removed the one you pointed out, although I am not quite convinced that someone who never heard of Bach's cycles would immediately recognize what is meant. --GA

music

The orchestra, oboes and strings, plays in this cantata "plays" should be "play"
The orchestra plays, but I dropped "orchestra", and tried to say what's unusual about that, please check. --GA
expanding each single line several new lines add a "to" before several
I used "by", - please check ref Dellal, where the chorale lines are bold and the others not, to see if it could be explained better. I was quite surprised that the librettist sometimes added in the middle of a sentence. --GA

source and image review

Images look good, mostly public domain, but there is an CC BY 2.5 image of an instrument. Sources look fine too. 750 h+ 03:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image licenses are Chinese to me, can you explain, or could perhaps Dan help again, or could you fix something missing? --GA
i don't see any problems with the image licensing. --750
see how little I understand, - I though the abbr meant a problem --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

haha that's fine. 750 h+ 08:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

verdict

@Gerda Arendt: happy to pass when all of these are addressed. 750 h+ 03:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reviewing! Replies point by point. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:27, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Passing for GA 750 h+ 08:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.