Talk:Nikon FG

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Photography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Contributer 4.240.242.185 is wrong to say that the Nikon FG's resale value is poor. The FG has held its value just as well as most other SLRs of its era. A chrome FG body that sold new for $149 from the photo retailer B&H Photo in December 1984 was $149 in EX+ condition from the used photo dealer KEH in December 2005. Compare this with a chrome Canon AE-1 Program: $170 new in 1984, $179 EX+ in 2005; Minolta X700: $180 new in 1984, $179 EX+ in 2005; Pentax Super Program: $190 new in 1984, $144 EX+ in 2005; or even the professional level Nikon F3HP: $435 new in 1984, $449 EX+ in 2005. Only in comparison with the rarer and collected Nikon FE2 ($218 in 1984, $299 in 2005) does the FG look inferior. If anything, the FG's price to value ratio is superior to any of these other SLRs. The unloved Nikon of this era is really the FA: $399 in 1984, $286 in 2005. Note that the prices of all film cameras of the 1980s have been dropping precipitously as they become too old to repair and digital photography takes over.

References

Anonymous. B&H Photo advertisement pp 168-171. Modern Photography, Volume 48, Number 12; December 1984.
Massey, David; Bill Hansen & Larry Hicks. KEH.com catalogue Volume 12, 2005. Atlanta, GA: KEH.com, 2005.

Paul1513 22:01, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RV: agenda pushing. This is not a collector's fan site, but an encylopedic page of factual information. Objective viewpoints must include all relevant information, kind or unkind to an owner's beloved model of camera. -Tim 3 AUG 2006

Images available

~ Bigr Tex 22:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC) htnugyu hfv[reply]

Commencing clean-up

This article required extensive clean-up and additional sub-headings to make it easier to read. Starting 26/11/2008 I will attempt to re-format this article and include relevant references where missing. I also will add some images of the Nikon FG and relevant accessories from my provate collection.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nikon FG. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090114115437/http://imaging.nikon.com:80/products/imaging/technology/archives/filmcamera/slr/1980-1984/fg/ to http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/technology/archives/filmcamera/slr/1980-1984/fg/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]