Talk:Nigel Farage/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 14:35, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be glad to take this review. Thanks in advance for your work on it. -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:35, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On review, this appears to me to be a bit of a premature nomination.

The "citation needed" tag in the lead needs to be addressed.
Also, major information should not be presented in the lead not discussed in more detail in the body.
All figures and statistics need to be sourced with inline citations, such as the electoral results in the final section.
All quotations need inline citations, such as in "Views on the Euro" or "Joseph Daul"
It seems unbalanced to provide a long block quotation from Buzek but not from the article's subject in the Van Rompuy section; this is a minor WP:NPOV issue
Numerous short sections are discouraged by WP:LAYOUT, as are one-sentence paragraphs; this will need to be reorganized.
Language like "Farage is presently the leader of" should be rewritten per WP:REALTIME.
The lead should be no more than 4 paragraphs per WP:LEAD

You can see the full GA criteria at WP:GA?. Since there's substantial work to be done, I'm not listing the article at this time, but I hope that you'll continue work on this one and consider renominating in the future once these problems have been addressed. Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:43, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]