Talk:Niels Petersen House

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

This is a viable historical article about the historic Niles Petersen House in Tempe, Arizona. I am posting this wikipedia listing as an intern for the Tempe Historic Preservation Office with their full blessing. Furthermore, all research and citations in the articles comes from my work as an intern with this office. Therefore, there is no reason why this article should be deleted.

Assuming the article is not written as a blatant advertisement and does not infringe on anyone's copyrights, there is no reason for the article to be speedy deleted. However, it is still subject to nomination for deletion discussion if the article does not make clear how the house is notable. —C.Fred (talk) 17:17, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of copyright infringement, I just removed a section of the text that was copied from [1]. —C.Fred (talk) 17:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like a fine starter article. I removed some negative tags from the article. There is no conflict of interest present, and the article is not an orphan. Thanks! --do ncr am 00:05, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]