Jump to content

Talk:Nicopolis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Well, there is also the modern village of Nicopolis on the North part of the ancient one. Should we include it here somehow? It isn't worth creating another article for it. Hoverfish Talk 15:12, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These two pages are talking about exactly the same place.

Yes, one article is focused on its secular past and the other on its ecclesiastical one, but that's what section headings are for.  — LlywelynII 08:04, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For for it. And somebody mention what modern country these are in and where on the map. And here's a Fun Roman Wall JPG added to the other one. CarolMooreDC🗽 12:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have been bold and merged. The titular see artcle was outdone by the main article even on the ecclesiastical aspect. Esoglou (talk) 20:07, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Add material from the French version

[edit]

I've added some translated material from the wiki French version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjdeadly (talkcontribs) 07:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nicopolis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]