Talk:Nicolia (plant)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles

Palaeontology

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles

Plants

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles

Aachenosaurus

Because Aachenosaurus is a plant and not a dinosaur, remove Aachenosaurus from the categories "Invalid dinosaurs" and "Nomina dubia".

Yeah, I agree. Paleo Kid (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why? It is an invalid dinosaur, because it was named as a dinosaur and found to be a plant. It is a nomen dubium because it is impossible to tell what species of plant it should be synonymized with. MMartyniuk (talk) 23:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At present Aachenosaurus is presented as an accepted name in the taxon box, with Aachenoxylon as a synonym, however botanists (at least) would consider this the wrong way around, see e.g. Edwards, 1931: https://www.google.com.au/books/edition/Fossilium_Catalogus_II_Plantae_Pars_17_D/C0xOC0jK7qMC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Aachenosaurus+Aachenoxylon&pg=PA16&printsec=frontcover and IFPNI: http://ifpni.org/genus.htm?formIndex=def&name=Aachenoxylon&submitForm=Search ... I may come back and fix this later if folk are agreeable (would need a page creating for Aachenoxylon as well)... My guess being that Aachenoxylon being validly published in botany, Aachenosaurus not so (published only as a zoological name). Regards - Tony Rees, IRMNG Tony 1212 (talk) 19:37, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]