Talk:Nicole Walker

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Untitled

Taken from storyline article to incorporate into this article:

Nicole Walker

Finally, the writers eagerly exploited the show's newest (at that time) character, Nicole Walker (Arianne Zuker). Originally a girl from the wrong side of the tracks, Nicole was hired as a model by one time Titan Industries employee Sami, and Kate later paid her a large sum of money to marry Lucas, to help Lucas win custody of his son. Through the Robertses, Nicole discovered the power of money and quickly manipulated her way into the bed of Victor Kiriakis, much to Kate's horror. As her marriage to Lucas ended, she married Victor and found herself rich and powerful, though Nicole found herself outmatched when she crossed swords with Victor. Having survived a near fatal stroke that left him paralyzed for several years, Victor was determined to never be helpless again and used the fact that Nicole murdered a rogue doctor Colin Murphy (Justin Melvey) when he tried to blackmail her to keep her under his thumb. Much to Victor's horror, Nicole became involved with his grandson, Brady Black. Victor was soon presumed dead and was therefore unable to prevent Nicole from seducing Brady. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IrishLass0128 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Nicole's marriage has not been retconned. It has not been mentioned on screen so we don't know yet what happened to that man. Since she's still married to Victor, that marriage would have been invalid anyway. RionDC (talk) 19:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're a sock puppet, I just can't figure out of which one of two editors you are. Your unconstructive edits and removal of valid information are vandalism. Do not continue adding/removing content including the infoboxes. KellyAna (talk) 19:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're wrong. Her marriage wasn't retconned so stop putting fake information in there. As well, leave the Hogan Sheffer page alone, HE WAS FIRED! Clearly you don't know your facts, woman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RionDC (talk • contribs) 19:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baby Switch

It seems unnecessary to add the two babies recently switched to Nicole Walker's profile. First of all, Sydney DiMera is not her adopted daughter, no adoption papers were filed on THAT baby. It was the baby she switched, so she has no legal rights. Second of all, there is no information that says that Sami has named her daughter Grace DiMera, but she isn't even her real or adopted daughter. So, again, I think adding children to Nicole's box is pointless since she has neither biological or adopted children. What do other editors think? Rm994 (talk) 04:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole has been put on the birth certificate of Sydney as her birth mother even though that we know she is not her mother. Mia thinks that Nicole has Grace and she doesn't have her. --M42380 (talk) 04:27, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's absolutely no need to add children to her box because it seems to me after watching her character develop over the years, she a scheming (expletive) and always gets what she wants. Eventually, the lies will catch up to her and she will lose everything. Bottom line, the truth will come out, whether she likes it or not and EJ will dump her like she was yesterday's news. Besides, how can she be a mother when she can't even give birth to her own children? That's my take on the situation. :) HabsMTL (talk) 02:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While all that is true, I am concerned that the scope of the article is getting lost in too many plot details. The reality of the situation is, Nicole has no children. Rm994 (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Rm994 asked me to comment here, so I thought I'd take a look at things. First, I don't watch the show, so I have no opinion on the question of children. However, I'm concerned about whether or not there should even be a page on this character at all, since the sources are so minor. Are there any non-soap sources to affirm that this character is notable? --El on ka 18:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the only child that should be put up is the daughter Nicole lost in November.

Elonka,yes there should be a page on Nicole Walker. She is a MAJOR character on Days and has been on the show for many years. As for notable sources what about NBC's Days webpage? Or how about you just turn on your TV and see she is a major character,there is no better proof than seeing it with your own eyes.--99.177.250.140 (talk) 16:02, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Porn Star as Occupation

I have decided to remove porn-star from Nicole's list of occupations. As she was forced into pornography but her father when she was young that constitutes as child sexual abuse, and I don't believe that it should be included as she was a victim and didn't willingly set out to be a porn-star. I mean would we consider all victims of child/teen pornography to be porn-stars? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.176.49 (talk) 08:09, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]