Talk:Nico Hülkenberg/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Nico Hülkenberg. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Nico or Nicolas
I was wondering, per WP:COMMONNAME, whether this page should be named Nico Hülkenberg. Williams, BBC, Autosport and Formula One all call him Nico. I don't think I have ever heard him called Nicolas. What do others think? - mspete93 [talk] 18:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- And here is his official site, which also uses Nico Hülkenberg – I agree. Darth Newdar talk 18:34, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- I also agree; I've only rarely seen him been referred to as "Nicolas" outside this article.--Midgrid(talk) 19:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- I agree too - "Nico Hulkenberg" returns many more Google hits than "Nicolas Hulkenberg" (I realise that's not a foolproof indicator). DH85868993 (talk) 09:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- I've been bold. This really is a non-issue. Pyrope 14:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- I agree too - "Nico Hulkenberg" returns many more Google hits than "Nicolas Hulkenberg" (I realise that's not a foolproof indicator). DH85868993 (talk) 09:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- I also agree; I've only rarely seen him been referred to as "Nicolas" outside this article.--Midgrid(talk) 19:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
(2010 - present)
Ok, it seems logical do add the 2010 - present thing doesn't it. Also I'd like to say sorry for some misleading info to BretonBanquet after I said Trulli's or Kovalinen's article had the presents' when they did not my mistake. Sorry I should have checked. But it seems logical to add the present to the article after all it is the present isn't it. (Wiki id2 (talk) 18:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC))
- No, it's as godawfully illogical as it gets. 2010 is the present, so what exactly does "2010-present" actually mean? What's the difference between "2010-present" and simply "2010"? In 2011 it would make sense - until then it doesn't. Bretonbanquet (talk) 18:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Agree with Bretonbanquet. - mspete93 18:52, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Not only the points made by Bretonb, but some of the information in that section dates back to 2007, so calling it "2010 - present" is potentially confusing. Pyrope 21:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)