Talk:Nick Jordan (artist)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Edit to wording and citation
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
- Please remove the word 'widely' in the sentence Jordan's work has been shown widely at international galleries, museums and film festivals':
- The word 'widely' is be seen as subjective.:
- References supporting the possible change:(format using the "cite" button): https://www.holdengallery.mmu.ac.uk/2020/interruptions-nick-jordan/
194.74.185.34 (talk) 15:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Removed per WP:PUFFERY. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thankyou 194.74.185.34 (talk) 16:33, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Remove COI template
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Please can an editor remove the COI template by checking for non-promotional neutrality and that the article fairly represents the sources cited. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorbert30 (talk • contribs) 17:21, June 10, 2024 (UTC)
- Not done yet. Whether it's neutral isn't for you to judge. There is still an overall promotional quality to the article, and someone is going to have to go through it carefully, checking and editing. This takes time. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Appreciate if this can be fixed too. What is the specific issue that needs to be checked and edited, as per guidelines at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Template:COI
- Thanks for any help. Jorbert30 (talk) 08:31, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]I am having a hard time seeing that Wikipedia's notability requirements are met. The sources seem to be mostly from the venues that have exhibited Jordan's work, so they would be considered primary sources and not independent of the subject; naturally they would promote their own exhibitions. All these sources accomplish is verifying existence, not establishing notability. Therefore, I have added a notability tag onto this article too.
@Jorbert30: Please look at the criteria in Wikipedia:Golden Rule and explain which three sources cited in the article meet all of those criteria. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, thanks for your input. Citations 1, 2 and 8 are examples of independent sources, not from venues that exhibited subject's work. Hope this clarifies notability. Jorbert30 (talk) 07:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Anachronist - just following up again as a new citation (secondary source) has been added to a Guardian review of the film Concrete Forms of Resistance. Many of the other citations (eg 1, 2, 3, 4, 8...) are secondary sources, independent of the subject or venue, such as reviews in professional contemporary art journals and film magazine publications etc. I believe these are all reliable, independent sources and meet the Wikipedia: Golden Rule.
- There are also no specific, editable COI issues flagged, so please could you or an editor re-review and remove the templates. That would be much appreciated. Many thanks again. Jorbert30 (talk) 13:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
- Please can an editor check over the page for any specific COI issue or Notability issue and remove anything that doesn't meet guidelines, and when satisfied please remove the temporary COI and Notability templates, many thanks:
- I've answered the question on the article's talk page, explaining that many of the citations (eg 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8...) are secondary sources, independent of the subject or venue, such as reviews in professional contemporary art journals and film magazine publications etc. I believe these are all reliable, independent sources and meet the Wikipedia: Golden Rule. There are also no specific, editable COI issues flagged, and I have declared COI on my user page.:
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button - examples of reliable secondary sources):
https://corridor8.co.uk/article/nick-jordan-natural-interaction/ http://thisistomorrow.info/articles/nick-jordan-mental-state-signs https://www.theguardian.com/film/2021/aug/02/true-stories-spaces-review-short-docs-from-folk-horror-to-a-lebanese-marvel
Jorbert30 (talk) 16:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
References
- Thanks for your help. Very much appreciated. Jorbert30 (talk) 20:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)