Talk:Nick Cotton
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
PLANS FOR A COMEBACK?
[edit]Are there any known plans for Nick Cotton to return to EastEnders? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexWilkes (talk • contribs)
- No there aren't. By the way, Alex, please read and respond to the comments on your talk page!!! — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Nick heroin.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Nick heroin.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Nick1985.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Nick1985.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Mark&NickCotton.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Mark&NickCotton.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Source
[edit]I haven't read this yet but it probably has something that fits into this article (or maybe some other article) [1] AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- [2] - There's never a dull moment with Nick Cotton around.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 04:29, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Future of the character
[edit]Does anyone know what is due to happen to the character of Nick Cotton? His most appearance was in June 2009, and it is a common practice for the character to disappear for months and sometimes several years at a time before returning, but are there any know plans for what will happen to the character this time; ie, is he being lined up for another comeback or will the character be killed off? Sir Stanley 20:40, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- There are no current plans that we know of to do anything with the character. If there were, I'm sure they'd be added to the article pretty quickly. AnemoneProjectors 20:00, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Is he returning
[edit]I read that he will be killed off off-screen but it says now on his profile he will return this year. Is this true? I hope it is as I was gutted when I read he would die off-screen. Shakirfan (talk) 16:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Apparently Daily Mail have broken the embargo earlier today to reveal he is returning, however it's not up anymore and probably won't be until midnight, so I'll leave it as it is until it's up. (Eastendersfan2006 (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC))
Since March 2014/recent edits
[edit]It is important to have necessary information. Edits by 5 Albert Square have been extremely lacking in detail. No info has been given on what Nick has done, why he has returned to Walford, how Dot has found out, why he cut the brakes, why Ronnie hates him, who knows etc. It completely misses the point of the storyline and that should not be acceptable. That is why my edits are necessary and aren't a 'blow-by-blow account'. Also, the death of Emma Summerhayes is important because it links directly to the Who killed Lucy Beale storyline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.245.7 (talk) 15:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nick Cotton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402013058/http://www.whatsontv.co.uk/soaps/eastenders/interviews/john-altman-on-nicks-dramatic-exit/5916/ to http://www.whatsontv.co.uk/soaps/eastenders/interviews/john-altman-on-nicks-dramatic-exit/5916
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Nick and Zoe
[edit]Were they married? Someone has been removing all references to them being married but the articles have always said they were married. So what is it please? — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 10:18, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- No, Zoe stated in 1993 that she was just his girlfriend and they split in 1994, with no word of a marriage 51.230.64.222 (talk) 14:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)