Talk:Nick Adams (commentator)

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Nick Adams (commentator) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 May 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

Deletion

I believe Nick Adams wrote his own wikipedia page, and he likely doesnt meet notability criteria. However, I have only made a few edits before (IP) and made an account just to flag this issue, so I will leave it to someone else to possibly delete it. Fieryphoenix2 (talk) 01:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It has already passed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, so it is deemed notable. LibStar (talk) 02:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw this discussion and wanted to mention i created this article in 2017 due to the Trump tweet about him, I was fascinated at the time at Trump tweeting out books as if he was being paid to plug them while president. So Nick didn't create it himself, and I certainly wouldn't agree with his politics. As to whether its been morphed into a vanity page, I haven't looked.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 18:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If it was a vanity page it wouldn't have included that photo. 38.15.84.177 (talk) 13:33, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mean you raise a good point, but the article still tells you nothing about a guy who doesn't seem to have done much. How did this pass Wikipedia:Articles for deletion? 2603:8081:2600:400:7C40:B77D:308:F13 (talk) 21:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe lack of interest? Dear God let it be lack of interest. If this guy isn't a troll, and he's genuinely like this, he's shocking, and successful. I don't like him at all, but given the nonsense he continually tweets (like seeing some guys physically fighting over a Trump NFT), I hold out hope that he's just all tongue-in-cheek. 117.20.68.49 (talk) 01:17, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He's a frequent guest on Fox programs and other conservative podcasts and shows. I think some of Tweets are tongue and cheek but he's definitely a noteworthy conservative commentator/author and deserving of a Wikipedia page. Thomashern4 (talk) 23:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 January 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Correct date of birth from September 5, 1985 to September 5, 1984. ^[1] Chexford (talk) 18:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://twitter.com/NickAdamsinUSA/status/1566883490464903168?s=20&t=Y8qbD4C72ptycgcgp1SsoA

Done Lightoil (talk) 07:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

tongue-in-cheek

It seems sort of misleading to say he's a twitter troll. Some of his tweets are clearly facetious. In other words, he's a conservative guy who frequently exaggerates his politics in various ways for comedic effect on twitter. I realize I don't have a source, I'm just raising the issue. Sorry for being too lazy to look for a source. This isn't the funniest tweet or anything, but I picked it out because it's clear he's joking and not trying to trick or troll anyone or anything like that: https://twitter.com/NickAdamsinUSA/status/1629653764578607105 Benevolent Prawn (talk) 03:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He's not joking 47.54.237.189 (talk) 21:59, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Nugent as a country music artist?

I don’t think most of Ted Nugent’s musical output can be called country, and he certainly isn’t known for that, contrary to what this article claims. It’s true that he holds conservative political views and has a “redneck” persona like the stereotypical country musician, but he himself isn’t one. He’s more of a heavy metal artist, like Jon Schaffer is. So this article should reflect that when referring to him.2600:1014:B031:55F7:DD1D:E492:371F:3BDB (talk) 16:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Pennsylvania2 (talk) 19:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change Nick Adams' main photo on his wikipedia page to a more promising/good looking photo. Since the photo now isn't very flattering nor fits the personality of Nick Adams. A better picture would be from his Twitter/X Account where he has better photos taken of himself. Travisj1930 (talk) 00:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Please make your request for a new image to be uploaded to Files For Upload. Once the file has been properly uploaded, feel free to reactivate this request to have the new image used. Note that images uploaded on Twitter are not freely licensed unless explicitly stated and that the copyright of the images is presumed to belong to the user, so don't upload the image to Commons unless you're sure of its copyright status. Liu1126 (talk) 01:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citation or Clarification

"He has said that since he held conservative views that he had to wait nearly five years to acquire citizenship because of discrimination by the Obama administration." This statement needs to be cited in some way or contextualized in a way that clarifies that it's Adams's interpretation or belief as to what delayed his citizenship, as opposed to how it reads, which appears to be acknowledging the reason as valid, without citation. 69.60.33.176 (talk) 21:41, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://twitter.com/NickAdamsinUSA/status/1566883490464903168?s=20&t=Y8qbD4C72ptycgcgp1SsoA

[1]