Talk:Nicholas Winterton

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Cheshire Low‑importance

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Fox hunting#Hunting bans in the UK|ban on fox hunting]] The anchor (#Hunting bans in the UK) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Expenses

I made an edit to the expense story only to found it reverted. I hope this new attempt is more appeasing Nev1. The only remotely controversial part I would guess is that you may argue that the story doesn't warrant it's own sub-section. With the level of public interest in expenses at the moment (cf. notability) and the Times headline "Expenses row: Tory reveals all", BBC headline "Wintertons broke expenses rules" and the citation itself from the Telegraph, I would disagree. Apologies for the amateur nature of the contribution and the messy history page. 82.36.120.58 (talk) 14:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this picture the most relevant/appropriate available?

The most prominent person in the profile picture as of 19/10/09 is not the subject but the late Ian Smith, former Prime Minister Rhodesia.

Is this the most relevant picture available? Is it even neutral and fair considering that Smith is such a controversial figure?

What about the picture http://www.dodsdata.com//Resources/epolitix/MPWebsites/Photos/m-p/Nicholas-Winterton.jpg at Winterton's website http://www.epolitix.com/mpwebsites/mpwebsitepage/mpsite/sir-nicholas-winterton/mppage/home-91/?no_cache=1 which is presumably usable?

I'm not myself familiar with the licensing issues about photos on Wikipedia. --Jmrichardson (talk) 09:40, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion in order to be treated neutrally and fairly the subject should also be a fair person. The only people in the country who believe him to be a fair person are his wife and his children who are the benefactors of his diversion and sequestration of tax payers funds.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nicholas Winterton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]