Jump to content

Talk:Nice to Meet Ya (Meghan Trainor song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNice to Meet Ya (Meghan Trainor song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starNice to Meet Ya (Meghan Trainor song) is part of the Treat Myself series, a good topic. It is also part of the Meghan Trainor's Billboard Hot 100 entries series, a featured topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 18, 2020Good article nomineeListed
June 18, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
October 17, 2023Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Nice to Meet Ya (Meghan Trainor song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 14:54, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Infobox

[edit]
  • Fine

Lead

[edit]
  • lyrics about self assurance. → add to the compostion section, with a source
  • Critics were mostly positive of the song → see below + Music critics
  • calling it one of the best tracks on Treat Myself → says who?

 Done

Background and composition

[edit]
  • I will fix this, see if you are ok with the changes in the meantime.

 Done

Critical reception

[edit]
  • "Nice to Meet Ya" received mostly positive reviews from critics. → "Nice to Meet Ya" received mixed reviews from critics. Idolator, NME, The Arts Desk → positive; Pitchfork, PopMatters → negative

 Done

Chart performance

[edit]
  • It also gave Minaj...→ At that time, it also gave Minaj
  • It charted at number 88 → It peaked at number 88
  • and number 13 on the New Zealand Hot Singles chart → and number 13 on the New Zealand Hot Singles chart, an extension to the New Zealand Top 40 Singles Chart + wikilik fot the latter chart

 Done

Background

[edit]
  • Fine

Synopsis

[edit]
  • Merge this section with the one below. Call it "Synopsis and recpetion", let the paragraphs as they are

 Done

Reception

[edit]
  • MTV not in italic

 Done

Live performances

[edit]
  • This needs to be merged into other section.

 Done

Personnel

[edit]
  • Use {{spaced ndash}} so there is the right space between credits and personnel
  • Was this the order they have in the inlay notes? I doubt it
  • Composer is different from songwriter, let's stick to the latter

 Done

Charts

[edit]
  • Use Ireland3 for an automatic source

 Done

Release history

[edit]
  • The australia one doesn't give me a date
  • Align center the references

 Done

References

[edit]
  • radiodate.it → Radio Airplay SRL + language Italian
  • All Access Music Group, Idolator, Good Morning America and MTV → publisher
  • The Music Network → wikilink

 Done

[edit]
  • Fine

Overall

[edit]
  • MarioSoulTruthFan, I believe I have addressed everything. Reception and live performances aren't related sections though, so I am having trouble justifying merging them since it would confuse readers. I can picture live performances being merged with music videos and the whole section being titled 'Promotion', but then the cumulative section will probably become too big.--NØ 08:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@MaranoFan: Do that instead, it's better. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Most good articles seem to omit songwriters from the personnel section, since they aren’t usually present in the studio. Should I include them there?—NØ 18:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Of course you should most FA's have it. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]