Jump to content

Talk:Nica Noelle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Personal life

[edit]
  • Per this edit, if HW took the time to really read the article, s/he would realize that the information about Noelle's relationship with Satine Phoenix isn't sourced from just any "retailer hype page"; the retailer is Noelle's own company. Sorry if I sound harsh, HW, but the disputes on your talk page make me wonder why you're often so cynical with your removal of content. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 05:55, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retailer hype is retailer hype. Fails WP:BLP and WP:RS. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 13:40, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Response to third opinion request:
I don't see any grounds for complaints about BLP here, since the information is something that the subject herself claims to be true. The only exception would be if Satine Phoenix has said somewhere that it's not true - the mere claim that a porn actress is in a relationship with another woman does not seem to me to be inherently libellous.

The question, therefore, is as to whether the subject is a RS about herself, given that the website is essentially a self-published source. The criterion that applies here is whether "the material is... unduly self-serving". Given the context, it's entirely possible that this is promotional, but I don't think it's unduly self-serving, in a way that a statement such as "...is one of the greatest porn actresses in recent history" might be, or even (say) what her claimed favourite sexual positions are. I would recommend making the source of the information more explicit, by saying something such as "according to her official website..." That way the claim is entirely factual (her website does indeed say that) and readers can then judge for themselves whether or not they find it plausible.—Anaxial (talk) 07:43, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Nica Noelle which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.sexherald.com/interview-sex-professionals/behind_the_scenes_with_nica_noelle__sweetheart_v.html
    Triggered by \bsexherald\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Nica Noelle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]