Talk:Next Gen ATP Finals

Tennis Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennis To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Take an item off the Cleanup listing
Copyedit : Roger Federer, Leander Paes, Rafael Nadal, Justine Henin – to be used as examples for ideal page structures
Expand : Grab a Start article and expand it, or peruse the List of articles.
Photo : Add photos to Tennis or Tennis people articles
Stubs : Bring a Stub up to our standards.
Other : *Sign up as a member of the project.
Tag more articles with our standard project template.
Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.

Is it a REAL atp title? Exhibition.

I think that it shouldn't be considered an official title and added among the official tally, but as an additional event. This is clearly an exhibition tournament. Rules are not standard, entry is highly restricted - not everyone has a chance to enter. I saw that Hopman cup is listed in exhibition tournaments list but follows more (all) tennis rules than this publicity stunt. For example if an exception is made for this thing than Hopman cup should be listed as a doubles title - more broad interpretation of doubles rules. This is just above junior grand slams. I would like this put up for a vote. 213.149.51.161 (talk) 03:33, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hopman Cup is not an exhibition, but this event is not considered an ATP tour event. This is actually more an exhibition. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected it to an exhibition, and fixed where Hopman Cup was listed as an exhibition event. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would definitely agree with "this event is not considered an ATP tour event. This is actually more an exhibition." But the reason why I posted on this talk page is because on the event's winner page it is listed under ATP career finals. So I wanted this clarified at the source. 213.149.51.252 (talk) 07:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is sponsored by the ATP... even has ATP in the title. But it's an exhibition. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edited the Grand Slam winners and finalists tables

It is expected that more and more next gen players will appear in grand slam finals and possibly win grand slams in the coming years. The old tables could only handle 1 or 2 grand slams. So I went ahead and modified these tables to be more compatible with future events.

Separate columns for each grand slam (AU, FR, WB, US)
Cleaned up references to contain links only to the "Titles and Finals" section on each players atptour.com page

Thanks!

Kvwiki1234 (talk) 22:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest... this article is about the Next Generation ATP Finals, not about the players future achievements. That whole section on "Subsequent achievements of Next Gen ATP Finals player" is article bloat and trivial to what this article is about. We don't do this with any other finals. We don't do this with jr Grand Slam champions, we don't do this with minor league Challenger level championships. I think the whole thing is original research and should go. Do we have sources that tells us what all the past winners of this event have accomplished? Because if we don't this section violates Wikipedia Guidelines and likely it's policies. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:08, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]