Talk:Newton (unit)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Newton (unit) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
‹See TfM›
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Archives: 1 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
This article was selected as the article for improvement on 22 January 2024 for a period of one week. |
Origin of name / History section
[edit]I think there should maybe be a "History" section that explains when this unit was created and named. Obviously it's named after Newton and the article says that, but when was it named? And by who? Nog642 (talk) 01:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- sounds good, go for it. Johnjbarton (talk) 01:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class physics articles
- High-importance physics articles
- C-Class physics articles of High-importance
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Wikipedia former articles for improvement