Talk:Newspaper endorsements in the 2006 Canadian federal election
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Should the CanWest papers be grouped together?
Anyone else find this rather disturbing? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.174.36.124 (talk • contribs) .
Ottawa Citizen
[edit]I think it's rather hard to believe that the Ottawa Citizen endorsed the Greens, especially given that they also appear to have endorsed the Conservatives. Can anyone figure out what's going on here. --Saforrest 17:25, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- They only endorsed Chernushenko. -- Earl Andrew - talk 18:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Newspaper endorsements in the Canadian federal election, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311074024/http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/editorial/story.html?id=a13e65ab-0055-41e4-83e7-27e78d4be2a4 to http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/editorial/story.html?id=a13e65ab-0055-41e4-83e7-27e78d4be2a4
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 18 February 2018 (UTC)