Talk:Newbold Verdon
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Neutrality of the article
[edit]This article reads like a review, not an encyclopedic entry. A rewrite may be required. JoshHolloway 18:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Mentioned in...
[edit]http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=132407&command=displayContent&sourceNode=132390&contentPK=16398776&moduleName=InternalSearch&formname=sidebarsearch —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.2.87.3 (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC).
- Thank you for this. May it be noted that those comments were made by a vandal who I battled (and won >.<!), so it's not like it got past the RC list without anyone noticing. JoshHolloway 18:44, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
OK, I've had a go at making it look and sound more like a wikipedia article, hope I haven't offended anyone. I think if you make it too positive sounding (rather than neutral) you may well attract the vandals back.
Ned —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.42.75.142 (talk) 19:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC).
- I don't live in Newbold Verdon, nor know anything about it, but I too will continue to make it more like a Wikipedia article by rearranging content (rather than adding other stuff). Also, Ned, thanks for your input but remember to sign your posts with four ~s (~~~~)! JoshHolloway 20:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, new at this. 80.42.57.171 10:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
OK, I've put in a couple of sources - but not sure who to link them to the numbers - should they be at the bottom of the article or something? 80.42.57.171 10:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)