Jump to content

Talk:New York Yacht Club Building/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 13:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a glutton for punishment; I'll take a look at this Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prelim

[edit]

Lede and infobox

[edit]

Site

[edit]
  • "all of which remained in the area at the end of the 20th century." What's the meaning of this? Do they not still remain?
    • Two or three stables remained in the area around 2001. One of them was demolished to make way for the Harvard Club of New York in the early 2000s, while another stable was mostly demolished except for its frame at some point afterward. The third former stable (and the only one that's still fully structurally intact) is the annex to the Algonquin Hotel, but that was converted to hotel use long ago, so sources disagree on whether this actually counts as a stable building. Epicgenius (talk) 23:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture

[edit]

History

[edit]

Critical reception

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • I think it would be better to organise the reference consistently, e.g. take the long form references out of the citations list and add them to the sources list, leaving short citations in their place
  • References look good. AGF on print sources.

@Epicgenius: Hi, that's all I have for now. Will await your responses. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review @Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I'll have these done by tomorrow. To comment briefly on the reference format, however—typically I tend to group web and news sources in the "citations" section, and I use the shortened footnotes only if I'm citing books and magazines with multiple pages. I've done this in the past, on articles like New York Stock Exchange Building, where I combine both short references for {{Cite book}} citations and long-form references for {{Cite web}}/{{Cite news}} style citations.
Everything else looks like it can be relatively easily resolved, so I will fix these after work. Epicgenius (talk) 18:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Pickersgill-Cunliffe, thanks again for the review. I've addressed all of these issues now, except for the reference issue. Epicgenius (talk) 23:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Epicgenius: Passing this article as satisfying the GA criteria. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:41, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]