Talk:New York State Route 92/GA1

GA review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Mostly good here, but this sentence doesn't make sense: The concurrency is short-lived, lasting for only .16 miles (0.26 km), when 92 turns to the southeast again.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   I'd really like to see more information on the route as it is over 17 miles long, but it's comprehensive.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Another picture would be nice, but I think one is fine.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Good work overall, but there is that one sentence. Pretty minor, so once you get that done it'll be good to go. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 23:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Done. Thanks JC.^Mitch32^contribs 23:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Very good. It passes. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)