Jump to content

Talk:New York State Route 75/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 04:06, 1 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]


No disamb. links or invalid external links.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Use American spellings: "amongst"->"among"
    Done.Mitch32(Erie Railroad Information Hog) 19:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    "Development along the highway quickly rises in volume"->"Development along the highway quickly rises in density"
    Done.Mitch32(Erie Railroad Information Hog) 19:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep consistent with the south to north description of the highway, and the route is posted as north&south, but "NY 75 westbound merges directly into NY 5 eastbound, while NY 75 eastbound begins as an off-shoot of NY 5 westbound." Change it to "NY 75 northbound merges directly into NY 5 eastbound, while NY 75 southbound begins as an off-shoot of NY 5 westbound."
    Done.Mitch32(Erie Railroad Information Hog) 19:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Yahoo overview map does not highlight full route of NY 75 in ref. 5.
    Fixed, probably was out of date.Mitch32(Erie Railroad Information Hog) 19:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Explain that NY 5 is a limited access highway northeast of the NY 75 interchange.
    Done.Mitch32(Erie Railroad Information Hog) 19:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Are there any construction or improvement plans for NY 75?
    None.Mitch32(Erie Railroad Information Hog) 19:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Although not required for GA, do you have any traffic density data?
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 15:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Made most of the important changes, when and if TwinsMetsFan comes around, he can get the last one.Mitch32(Erie Railroad Information Hog) 19:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. I will continue to hold pending the return of TMF. Racepacket (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Traffic volumes along NY 75 are about what anyone would expect: less than 2,000 south of US 62 and over 10,000 along and north of US 62. I don't see a logical place in the article to put it, and given that the counts pretty much mirror the amount of development along the road - described by the RD - I question the need to mention it at all. – TMF 10:43, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome back and congratulations on another GA. Racepacket (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]