Talk:New York State Route 446/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am going to be reviewing this article which is currently up for Good Article Nomination. I will have the full review out shortly. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 18:56, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I doubt that the route description is OR, but it should be referenced.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Great job on this route, all that's missing is references for the Route description section, otherwise this passes GAN. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Added reference. Thanks.Mitch32^(UP) 21:04, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Great! GA 105 for you :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)