Talk:New Mexico State Road 81

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations	New Mexico
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Tables and stuff

I don't see any value in putting in an unsourced table that duplicates information in the paragraph above. See WP:SOURCELIST for further information. I think this is the road where somebody I know thought he'd be a smart alec and drive right up to the border, take a couple of pictures, then pull a three-point turn and drive back again; the guards were unimpressed and pulled him over. Also, Hachita seems to be about 10 trailers and a perfectly functioning post office, which sounds like a drug dealer's hangout. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The major intersections table, however redundant to prose, is indeed sourced and it follows MOS:RJL. In addition, WP:USRD/BIG3 suggests that the table should be there for the sake of completeness. –Fredddie ™ 11:36, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh great - we've got two parts of the MOS that contradict each other and now my brain has exploded. Since people who treat the MOS as absolute dogma and not guidelines are the cause of some of the most vitriolic arguments on the project, I'm off to find another article to edit. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting words in my mouth. All I am saying is that the junction list follows the format suggested by MOS:RJL. –Fredddie ™ 21:23, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]