Talk:New Jersey Route 20/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I will be reviewing this article in the coming hours, thanks -Marcusmax(speak) 20:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Overall good job on this article it is well referenced the images including the map appear to be in order and seems to cover the topic pretty well. However there are a few issues that need to be resolved that I have listed below .

1. The term "Route 20" is overused throughout both the Route description and History section, many of those can be simply replaced with "The route".

2. The term freeway is wiki-linked twice in the history section, only one of those is needed.

3. Finally I am a bit confused about your last sentence in the history section. It states that the addition was never completed and then goes on to say it was built in 2000. The two seem to contradict each other, if you could please clarify.

I have put this on hold until those minor changes are made, once they are I will gladly pass it. -Marcusmax(speak) 21:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone back and made the suggested changes. Dough4872 (talk) 02:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great in that case I will pass it now -Marcusmax(speak) 02:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]