Talk:New Jersey Route 173

New Jersey Route 173 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 2, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / New Jersey Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	New Jersey
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

New Jersey Mid‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Built in what area?

When I-78 was being built in the area, it was decided that part of US 22 would be used for the new highway. What eventually happened was that the eastbound lanes of US 22 became the westbound lanes of the new highway, the eastbound lanes of the new highway were newly constructed, and the westbound lanes of US 22 became NJ 173. US 22 and I-78 were then multiplexed on the new highway.

Umm... does this refer to I-78 between exits 11 and 13? -HiFiGuy 14:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 173/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This is an interesting, well-written article. I did a bit of copyediting, and a few things came up during the review:

While I won't hold up the review because there is no map, I would like to see a request placed for a map before the article passes.
"It is an old section of U.S. Route 22, running 14.62 mi (23.53 km)[1] from Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey, at an intersection with Interstate 78 and U.S. Route 22 to Clinton Township, New Jersey at an intersection with County Route 626 (Beaver Avenue) just east of an interchange with Route 31." - this sentence is too long and confusing
"concurrent" should be wikilinked in the lead
"running a farther distance to the north of Interstate 78/U.S. Route 22" - "running a farther distance" is awkward
"The route continues east to mile marker 11.13, where it splits into a one-way pair with eastbound Route 173 crossing over Interstate 78/U.S. Route 22 and making a left turn to merge onto eastbound Interstate 78/U.S. Route 22 at mile marker 11.70 and westbound Route 173 splitting from Interstate 78/U.S. Route 22 and continuing west 0.55 miles to join back with eastbound Route 173 at mile marker 11.13" - this is too complicated as a single sentence
"Construction of the portion of Interstate 78 built between Exit 11 (County Route 614) and Exit 13 in Union Township, completed in 1962, involved construction of new eastbound lanes and the conversion of the eastbound lanes of U.S. Route 22 into the westbound lanes of Interstate 78, turning this portion of U.S. Route 22 into a two-lane road" - this might work better as two sentences. Either way, though, "construction involved construction" should be rephrased.

I am placing this nomination on hold to allow for these concerns to be addressed and/or discussed. Any question and/or comments can be left here, as I have placed this page on my watchlist. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone back and made the suggested changes. By the way, I had put a request for a map at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Maps task force/Requests. Dough4872 (talk) 03:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. The article now meets all of the GA requirements, so I am promoting it. Thanks for your quick response and hard work, GaryColemanFan (talk) 18:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USRD GA audit

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 05:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Dough4872 (talk) 23:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New Jersey Route 173. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]