Jump to content

Talk:New Jersey Route 163

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNew Jersey Route 163 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 27, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 163/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Comments:

  1. New Jersey Route 163 should be Route 163 per WP:USSH.
  2. "in the county of Warren", change to "in Warren County, New Jersey" as first sentence should mention route is in New Jersey.
  3. The next couple sentences of the lead seem confusing as they jump from describing NJ 163 to describing the former bridge. I would reword the second sentence of the lead to say "It is the approach to the Delaware Bridge, a former road bridge over the Delaware River connecting the settlement of Delaware with Portland, Pennsylvania."
  4. In next sentence, change "it" to "this bridge".
  5. "and a short stretch to the south", what is this "short stretch"?
  6. In first sentence of history "originates" should be in past tense.
  7. In sentence "U.S. Route 46 was realigned once again when the Portland-Columbia Toll Bridge opened in 1953,[8] the alignment of the highway was changed to heading along former State Highway Route 8[3] (mostly New Jersey Route 94), where it ended at U.S. Route 611 and NJ 94, where it does to this current day.", add "with" after first comma, change "heading to "head", and change "where it does to this current day" to "its current terminus".
  8. In phrase "which took out several bridges over the Delaware" add "other" after "several".

I am placing the article on hold. Dough4872 (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but I disagreed with some of your replacements, so I used my own, and the "with" is grammatically incorrect.Mitch/HC32 01:43, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I will pass the article. Dough4872 (talk) 00:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on New Jersey Route 163. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]