Jump to content

Talk:New England Quarter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNew England Quarter has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 16, 2007Good article nomineeListed
October 29, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
February 13, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 17, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that a planning application for a 42-storey building in the recent New England Quarter development in Brighton, England, was rejected on twenty separate counts, including the negative effect it would have on the local microclimate?
Current status: Good article

Error?

[edit]

I believe the map showing the changes at the top of this article is incorrect. The top pedestrianized road should be to the right of the one currently shown

GA Passed

[edit]

This is a very pretty article with lots of nice pictures. It is well written, cites reliable sources, and provides broad (actually quite comprehensive) coverage of the topic. I've only got a few issues with citations for some statements, especially in the criticism and controversy section. I've tagged all the problematic citations with "citation needed." Additionally, in one place it wasn't entirely clear what council the article was referring to, I've tagged that with "clarify." That's it and it's GA.

Suggestions for improvements: make sure all the reference links point to the exact page that sources your material instead of pointing to the home page. Also, please remove those "Articles without sources" and "Articles needing clarification" categories at the bottom of the article after adding the citations and replace them with some new useful categories or lists. The lead is also quite nice and succinct. --Meowist 22:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review and advice, Meowist. I have addressed the points mentioned, providing citations for all but one of the tagged sentences and removing the other as I couldn't find a source. Similarly, I have clarified which council it was (B&H Council, before it became B&H *City* Council in 2000). I found a couple of examples of links not pointing to exact pages, but if there are any more, I'll try to sort those out soon as well. Hassocks5489 20:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pleased with the changes and am passing this article. Meow. --Meowist 21:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA on hold

[edit]

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed.

  • The lead does not adequately summarise the article.
  • External links only belong in the external links section
  • Image captions should be succinct.
  • References should state the author, publisher, publishing date and access date, if known.
  • Only headings and the lead should contain bold text.
  • Every statement that is challenged or likely to be challenged needs an inline citation.

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made and issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GA/R). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAC. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Regards, Epbr123 09:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I intend to make all of these changes as far as possible (although I may need help with identifying any extra citations needed, in case I miss any), but sadly I have no time at the moment; so I suppose it will have to be delisted and renominated later. I'm not moaning :), but it's slightly disappointing seeing a recent successful nomination being downgraded when no significant changes have been made in the interim; but I have read the discussion relating to the major review being undertaken of all Good Articles and fully understand why this needs to happen. Anyway, I expect I'll have time in a week or two to make the changes. Hassocks5489 11:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid the article has now been delisted. Good luck with the eventual renomination. Epbr123 23:32, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New England Quarter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New England Quarter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New England Quarter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on New England Quarter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New England Quarter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:New_England_Quarter&oldid=1229399865"