Talk:New Delhi (1987 film)

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on November 17, 2013. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

Promotional edits

Repeatedly adding problematic contents at the box office section. An editor is inserting contents with poor sources and WP:OR not cited in the given sources. The claim of "film ran over 300 days in Chennai Saffire theatre" is cited using Filmibeat.com, which is classified as an unreliable source per WP:ICTF. Also this claim "The film collected over ₹2 crore in Kerala box office,first movie to collect 2cr and have 1cr share" is added with this source, but in the source, there is no citation of the claim. For another claim - "the most grossing Malayalam film at that time", a total 9 sources are added as footnote. But by checking each of that, none of them cites this puffery. The editor is faking with sources and adding his own original research. Yackmann (talk) 12:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]