Talk:New Brunswick electoral redistribution

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: New Brunswick / Electoral districts Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Brunswick.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Electoral districts in Canada.

Requested move

New Brunswick electoral redistribution → List of New Brunswick electoral redistributions — the title New Brunswick electoral redistribution without an "s" just isn't grammatically correct. The title should at least be New Brunswick electoral redistributions, but I think List of New Brunswick electoral redistributions would be a better name for this article considering that there is not much text here other than the list. —Yvesnimmo 17:05, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

I would interpret redistribution as a mass noun, which would reverse the grammatical argument presented above. Is there evidence that Canadians adopt a different grammar in this instance? --Stemonitis 07:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 11:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]