Talk:Neutron poison

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Neutron poison article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

‹See TfM›

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Article

This article makes no mention of the fact that neutron poisons can also be used after nuclear meltdown to help slow the nuclear reactions and make the contaminated site 'safer'. Also to prevent further fission reactions from occouring. 67.162.168.248 (talk) 23:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Or, on the other hand, that the neutron poison Xe-135 is thought to have largely contributed to the Tchernobyl accident... 145.228.143.15 (talk) 12:09, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing (hopefully with no controversy) the link to Wikiproject Medicine

I am removing the template for Wikiproject Medicine. The subject of this article has nothing to do with medicine. No humans have or really can be poisoned by 'nuclear' poisons, which include such highly toxic substances as common household borax (sarcasm...).

Neutron poisoning rather involves certain elements that absorb neutrons and 'poison' the nuclear reaction in a reactor. The use of the term poison can be viewed similarly to how chemical engineers describe catalysts as 'poisoned'; certain contaminants in a chemical process stream can bond to a catalyst and stop the catalyst from functioning in a chemical reactor. This is described as 'poisoning' the catalyst.

No humans or animals are poisoned in this process, so I am removing the template for Wikiproject Medicine.Katana0182 (talk) 22:32, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved - second request was not needed - redirects are automatic Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:49, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear poison → Neutron poison — Nuclear poison may lead to potential confusion that the subject under discussion in the page is radiation poisoning, as demonstrated by someone templating the talk page of this article as belonging to the Wikiproject Medicine without reading the article, which has nothing to do with poisoning of humans or animals, but rather the 'poisoning' (poisoning as in a catalyst is poisoned) of neutron multiplication - e.g. the chain reaction - within a nuclear reactor. The (US) authority in this area - the USNRC - lists ([1]) both "nuclear poison" and "neutron poison" as synonyms for the subject of this page; changing the title to neutron poison will bring clarity as to what exactly is "being poisoned" (e.g. neutrons, specifically a chain reaction involving neutrons.). Katana0182 (talk) 23:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutron poison → Nuclear poison

Comment "neutron poison" would also be confused with the same, since neutron radiation exists... 76.66.192.73 (talk) 05:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Neutron poison. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]