Talk:Neuropathology
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Why no pictures?
[edit]Why aren't there any pictures? A spacial anomaly brought me here. 22:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
"Prominent currently practicing neuropathologists"
[edit]My greatest complaint about the current version of this article is the inclusion of a few living individuals under this category. While I don't disagree that these individuals are prominent neuropathologists, and I count several as friends and acquaintances, I don't think it appropriate to present a limited list of such people in an article of this sort. I would rather see an expansion of the history of who was instrumental in developing the field of neuropathology in the U.S, the U.K., Europe, etc. In addition, I would add several more journals to the list of academic journals specializing in neuropathology. Graypath (talk) 16:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Do these need to be separate articles? Neither even have a link to the other article. Alhead (talk) 17:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, they are distinct subjects. I have added a sentence to the Intro of each article addressing this point. Anomalous+0 (talk) 04:18, 13 June 2009 (UTC)