Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming/Workshop
Appearance
Current structure of article
[edit]- INTRODUCTION
- Definition, summary, focus, uses, criticisms
- OVERVIEW
- Philosophical stance
- evidence rather than theory base, "what is true/real", subjective perception, client oriented goals, "what works", wide open to development at whim
- Self-declared scope
- what is legitimately considered "fair game" by NLP - anything subjective. list...
- Descriptions by its major developers and promoters
- bandler, andreas etc's descriptions
- Theory
- dilts, bandler etc views on whether nlp has a theory, or is driven by one
- Meaning of "neuro-linguistic programming"
- senses, neural processing, brain lateralization (tangential?)
- FUNDAMENTALS
- Foundational assumptions/presuppositional beliefs
- map/territory, systemic process, positive intention, rapport, failure/feedback, choice/flexibility, meaning of your communication, people have resources, multiple descriptions, long list of other working principles and practices
- Conscious and unconscious process
- focus on "what works", conscious understanding not always relevant (relates to principles)
- Meta model and Milton model
- brief description, "based upon", chomsky, usage
- Modeling
- brief description, heart of nlp, purpose, scope of application (prosaic to esoteric)
- Anchoring
- Types, Uses, Etc
- Representational systems
- VAK, eye cues, language words, body types
- Other Concepts, Models and Techniques
- multiple positions, logical levels, V/K dissociation, submodalities, B.A.G.E.L.
- BACKGROUND (history of NLP)
- big section, probably needs own article and summary
- APPLICATIONS (target markets, usages)
- niche, commercial, charismatic
- Ethics in NLP
- Ecology, advocacy of win-win, unethical use
- CRITICISM
- Scientific analysis
- New Age
- energy, spirituality, esp etc
- Multiple branding/commercialization
- Ethical concerns
- Questionable applications/claims
- Cult usage and characteristics
In addition previous versions have included sections which could be merged back in:
- Research into NLP
- Applications - use of NLP in health, law enforcement, govt, education/coaching
- Is NLP a science
- NLP and (psycho)therapy/psychology
- Aspects of NLP - practicality, experimentation, observation and feedback, client centered, structure, clarity of thought
- History - intellectual antecedants
And should probably include also:
- NLP professional structure - qualifications, regulation (or lack of), qualifications needed to train, continuing ethics, integration with psychotherapeutic bodies etc (or not)
- Outdated models - brain lateralization, sole rep system, etc.
- Controversies - including professional views, etc
Edit at will!!
Comments and discussion of above structure
[edit]Outdated Models... Definitely a good section to add. Perhaps with some sourced quotes on the nature of how things progress in NLP.Doc Pato 21:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- And how they become outdated too. It's pretty much inherent in the choice of practice over theory. Want to edit it into the above? Its easier for collaborative editing, than editing the entire article. FT2 (Talk) 22:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)