Talk:Neural cryptography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science.

Untitled

Sorry, but I removed the part "Security against quantum computers". It seems to me that this is a very important fact to let it in the article without proper references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Faturita (talk • contribs) 05:36, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I restored it, and added a reference. Alas, my reference says that the original algorithm is not secure. --68.0.124.33 (talk) 20:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neural cryptography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070712012959/http://www.scipub.org/fulltext/jcs/jcs29710-715.pdf to http://www.scipub.org/fulltext/jcs/jcs29710-715.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Protocol Details 2.4.2

In 2.4.2:

"Outputs are different: one of the suitable learning rules is applied to the weights"

Do both parties update their models? Which output do they use? The "Learning with own tree parity machine" section says:

"Output(A) = Output(B) = Output(E): All the three parties update weights in their tree parity machines."

which contradicts parts 2.4.1 and 2.4.2 of the protocol.

Update: The paper seems to indicate that the protocol is wrong.^[1]. I'll update the protocol.

References

^ paper

[1] r

[1]