Jump to content

Talk:Nettie Metcalf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk15:41, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Buckeye chicken
Buckeye chicken

Created by Evedawn99 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • This is a new article that is long enough and decently, but not completely sourced. I'm adding a {{cn}} tag, but it looks like just one. Hook is interesting, image is free. Copyvio check has some issues, but I think that's because there are a number of properly attributed direct quotes and is fine. This is your second DYK, so QPQ isn't required. but I recommend merging the one-sentence paragraphs in the lead and "Officiating breed" because I think it would read better, but that's optional advice. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:46, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Muboshgu; thank you very much for the review. I appreciate your honesty and specific constructive feedback. I have since been able to relocate the source of the William Williams claim and have added it to the article. Besides this, I have made a few more edits for clarity and readability, including those suggested in your comment. Thanks again for the help. The Fonz (talk) 02:41, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All good to go for DYK. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:52, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Evedawn99 and Muboshgu: hi there! I'm afraid I'm not sure I trust any of the sources to make such a bold claim; we've had a lot of problems at DYK with hooks claiming to be the "first" or "most" or "only" thing, only to find counter examples in the wider press. It gets particularly bad when the sources are mostly local – is there stronger sourcing for such a claim? theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 02:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
for clarity while this is resolved. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 17:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and thank you for looking over this submission. I am not quite sure if these sources are strong enough, but here are a few more that state that Metcalf is the first/only female chicken breed developer. How to Raise Chickens (2013) ; The Suburban Chicken (2015): , The Complete Beginner's Guide to Raising Small Animals (2012): , and Star Milling. I understand the possibility of finding contradictory evidence; however, I am not able find any source that lists women who have created poultry breeds, nor can I find any other chicken breed created by a woman. These sources all state that Metcalf is the first woman to create a breed recognized by the American Poultry Association; perhaps the hook can be altered to fit this distinction so it is factually true? Please let me know if these suffice and thanks again for helping fact-check the statement. The Fonz (talk) 02:09, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@The Fonz: I think that would be advisable, yes :) theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 22:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think the new hook is good so I'll approve it. Onegreatjoke (talk) 14:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]