Jump to content

Talk:2013 Nepalese Constituent Assembly election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

<< Nepal parties agree on interim Prime Minister, new elections>> Maoists Block Deal to Break Nepal’s Long Political Deadlock>> Nepal Hopes for End to Political Deadlock>> Nepal Nears Deal on Elections>> Opposition-called strike cripples life in Nepal[1]Lihaas (talk) 19:52, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Election Commission and Results

[edit]

Election Commission of Nepal The Hindi translation through google can be of some help. Perhaps someone who knows tables can add some columns showing swings for seats and popular vote. Gabrielthursday (talk) 18:57, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can sort that out, but first - are the seats in the table the actual results? I notice the IP cleared out all the vote totals, so I don't know what to make of what they left in there. Number 57 19:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
They look generally correct to me. I think some of the Party names are slightly incorrect. I can fix one or two of those. Gabrielthursday (talk) 19:39, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Some errors. I'll amend from the Election Commission site. Gabrielthursday (talk) 19:48, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll have a look this evening using Google Translate if I have time. Thanks, Number 57 13:15, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the full whack from the PR side. I'll take a look at the FPTP stuff tomorrow evening if I have time. Number 57 22:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Great work, well done. Gabrielthursday (talk) 03:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder, if for simplicity's sake, we ought to sum up all the parties that didn't make it into parliament in an "other parties" line. At 30 represented parties, the table would be unwieldy even after the unrepresented parties removed. Gabrielthursday (talk) 05:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should leave them in, in order to have a complete record. I have to say I find it quite frustrating to go to other election articles and see an incomplete list. Number 57 23:25, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Very well. I don't have any strong feelings on the matter, though I do tend to think it makes Wikipedia look more like an archive and less like an encyclopaedia. Gabrielthursday (talk) 00:02, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can confirm that the majority looks accurate. However, on the table or figure on the top right that is titled as "Nepalese Constituent Assembly election, 2013", the photograph of "Jhalanath Khanal" is shown and the leaders name is mentioned as "Khadgra Prasad Oli". During the Assembly election Jhalanath Khanal was the UML party leader who was succeeded by Khadga Prasad Oli (KP Oli) on July 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.176.223.42 (talk) 19:53, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've fixed the picture – thanks for pointing it out. Number 57 21:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Nepalese Constituent Assembly election, 2013. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]