Talk:Neon Blue/GA1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Aoba47 (talk · contribs) 01:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Grabbing this for a review. Aoba47 (talk) 01:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Lead and infobox
- Since you mention the songwriters in the lead, I would also mention the producers.
- I would have but as Ryden also co-produced it, it would be a bit of a mouthful. — Calvin999
- For this part “while lyrically it”, please add a comma after “lyrically”.
- Added. — Calvin999
- I am not certain about this part “with a general consensus that it is a classic Steps song”. As someone who has never heard of Steps or their music prior to reading this article, this does not mean much to me. I think it would be better to replace this with a part on what aspects of the song were praised by critics.
- All three critics called it a classic Steps song. If someone isn't familiar, then it's incumbent on them to do some further reading. You're only reading it because you're reviewing it, it's unlikely you'd ever come across this article as you've never heard of them. Most people reading it will have an idea of who they are to be reading it in the first place. — Calvin999
- I still personally disagree. The phrase still seems rather empty and vague to me, but I will allow it. Aoba47 (talk) 15:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- All three critics called it a classic Steps song. If someone isn't familiar, then it's incumbent on them to do some further reading. You're only reading it because you're reviewing it, it's unlikely you'd ever come across this article as you've never heard of them. Most people reading it will have an idea of who they are to be reading it in the first place. — Calvin999
- For this part (It's accompanying music video), “it’s” should be “its”.
- Changed. — Calvin999
- I would revise this sentence (It's accompanying music video features a man and a woman who have had bad luck in their relationships meeting at a party in a night club and their luck turning around.) to avoid the repetition of the word “luck”.
- Changed. — Calvin999
- Composition and release
- I would add the year in which “Collide” was released.
- Added. — Calvin999
- Critical reception
- For this part (Villa also wrote that the song "glowing ode to celebrating away the bad times”), I believe that you are missing something between “song” and “glowing”.
- Added. — Calvin999
- Music video
- I would add a descriptive phrase in front of Lee Latchford-Evans to clarify that he is a member of Steps, as you have done with Ian “H” Watkins in a previous section.
- Added. — Calvin999
- For this part “It video ends with confetti”, the “It video” needs to be revised.
- Changed. — Calvin999
- Final thoughts
- Wonderful work with this. There is not much that needs improvement. Once all of my comments are addressed, I will be more than happy to promote this as a GA. Aoba47 (talk) 01:16, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. — Calvin999 09:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for the responses. I will ✓ Pass this. Aoba47 (talk) 15:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. — Calvin999 09:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.