Talk:Neo-expressionism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Contemporary Art (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Contemporary Art, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Contemporary ArtWikipedia:WikiProject Contemporary ArtTemplate:WikiProject Contemporary ArtContemporary Art

It is requested that an image or photograph of Neo-expressionism be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Sources

the style itself, was created by aggressive marketing and media promotion by the art dealers and galleries. Are there any references for this remark? Please supply horse and rider, otherwise it's simply no NPOV. RPD 00:00, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trans-Avantgarde

Trans-Avantgarde has to do with transitive. --Kobolf 05:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC) Didn't link --Kobolf (talk) 06:01, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picasso

In the article about Pablo Picasso it mentions him as one of the first people to venture into neo-expressionism. If he was then he should be listed in the article. Comments... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.69.235.75 (talk) 17:24, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Bowie

Should he be included? Agent Cooper (talk) 22:08, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neo-expressionism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060625193815/http://www.signandsight.com/features/773.html to http://www.signandsight.com/features/773.html/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]