Talk:Nenjil Or Aalayam/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 07:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Will look at this shortly, I've been busy with Sinatra!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:40, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Couldn't see much wrong with it, I fixed 5 or 6 things myself I think to save you doing it. Good effort.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld Thank you very much, Dr. Blofeld. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 03:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)