Talk:Nelicourvi weaver

Nelicourvi weaver has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 4, 2017. (Reviewed version).

Birds Low‑importance

Nelicourvi weaver is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Africa: Madagascar Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Madagascar portal This article is supported by WikiProject Madagascar (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nelicourvi weaver/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will take a look, and jot questions below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Use descriptors to let readers know who Scopoli, Sonnerat and Gmelin (e.g. "German naturalist" etc.) are.~~

~~In 1827, George Shaw assigns L. pensilis to the genus Ploceus~~ ~~- err, why present tense?~~

~~Also - two "assigned" in consecutive sentences, suggest choosing a synonym for one of them...~~

~~No subspecies have been describes~~ ~~-?described?~~

~~Vernacular names in Malagasi are...~~ ~~- the following names should not be in bold but either italics (I like italics but these get confused with scientific names) or quote marks~~

and these are morphologically very distinctive from the remaining species. - ...very distinct from the remaining species (surely?).

~~Link canopy, story, Aframomum, leaf litter, (bird) colony/ies, clutch~~

Copulations start during.. - why not just "mating begins during..."

I ~~put scientific names in parentheses if I list the common name - e.g. barn owl (Tyto alba)~~

Nice read, though a few grammar issues here and there. I think we got them all...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done

@Casliber: Thanks for the useful comments. I think I've covered them all. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do we have any sources for the meaning of any of the malagasi names?
I'd link waxbill

For the record, Earwig's copyvio check was clear.

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

- the last couple of things are not deal-breakers. I think we sorted all the prose issues. Either you'll find some sources for malagasi names or not. In any case, is ok. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Cas Liber for your review work.

Waxbill is linked now. Two web-based Malagassy dictionaries confirm the vernaculars as "name of a particular bird", but do not provide etymologies. Google Translate recognises the names as Malagassy, but do not provide a explanatory translation. I found one brief essay on etymology of Malagassy animal names but it does not include our species. We may have to rely on a native speaker to identify sources if these exist. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 13:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it. If we can't find it we can't find it, so no problem Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:09, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete

This might be the worst bird GA article ever I've seen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.194.141.59 (talk • contribs)

Could you be specific about the gaps you noticed? Shyamal (talk) 17:31, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]