Talk:Neil Malhotra

A fact from Neil Malhotra appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Neil Malhotra found evidence that voters reward incumbents for disaster-relief spending, but not for disaster-preparedness spending?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Neil Malhotra.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Asian Americans Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Asian Americans.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Neil Malhotra has found evidence that voters reward incumbents for disaster relief spending but not for disaster preparedness spending? "we show that voters reward the incumbent presidential party for delivering disaster relief spending, but not for investing in disaster preparedness spending" in the article here [1]; more independent sources here [2] and here [3]

Reviewed: Exempt, but reviewed Reuben Bright to support the process

Created by Astrophobe (talk). Self-nominated at 05:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
Other problems: - You need to include the hook fact in the article.

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Nice article! b uidhe 17:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh jeez, great point. I thought I had included that fact when discussing the paper in the article but clearly I forgot and just wrote it here. I've added it now. Thanks! - Astrophobe (talk) 18:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! b uidhe 01:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]