Talk:Negligent entrustment
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Is this a mistake?
[edit]>Evidence in such cases is usually presented through testimony about entrustor's knowledge of the entrustee's reputation for violence, and of specific acts of violence committed by the entrustor.
Shouldn't that last word be "entrustee"? You lend your gun to someone, even though you're aware the gun-borrower has committed a violent act in the past, and that makes you liable? It doesn't matter if you have committed violence in the past, it's lending the gun to a violent person that's relevant here. Right?