Talk:Negativicutes

Microbiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Are they all anaerobes?

The page has this line, "Most members of this class are obligate anaerobes" which I'm pretty sure needs to be all. If it isn't all, the exceptions should really be named because I have never heard of an aerobic member of the Negativicutes family.

Kafkanaut (talk) 9:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Merging pages Acidaminococcaceae and Veillonellaceae to Negativicutes

I decided to merge the wikipages Acidamniococcaceae and Veillonellaceae because its desciption was emended and accepted in 2010 by the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM) and listed in the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) to that of Class Negativicutes, Order Selenomonadales and families Veillonellaceae and Acidaminococcaceae.
Also the wikipage Veillonellaceae contains all the genera of the newly emended class Negativicutes containing both families Veillonellaceae and Acidaminococcaceae. Therefore I reasoned that the genera circumscription of the wikipage Veillonellaceae is the exactly the same as that of the wikipage Negativicutes, but the wikipage Negativicutes has more references and a detailed 16S rRNA-based LTP phylogeny.
Both wikipages Acidamniococcaceae and Veillonellaceae has the same one reference.
So why not make the wikipage Negativicutes the destination page for both?
Videsh Ramsahai (talk) 14:09, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Where does the name come from? Sounds like "not cute", but maybe "cutes" refers to some kind of skin... In any case, enquiring minds want to know. Mcswell (talk) 20:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong link?

i am not english,so sorry for my bad language

the linking here from negativicutes on the right side

there is that panel "Families&Genera"

and there are listed much of them-bacteria as i imagined, but one -centipeda refers not to a family or genus of bacteria, but to a PLANT (and i dont mena algae. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Centipeda)i mean the Plant genus centipeda, Family :Asteraceae

so could somebody fix this?

I just did something about that. I don't think we have an article on the bacteria genus; I just qualified the name here, so now it's a dead link Uporządnicki (talk) 17:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Negativicutes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130127030659/http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/classifphyla.html to http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/classifphyla.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:40, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]